Surefire XC3 vs. Streamlight TLR-7X

Surefire XC3 vs. Streamlight TLR-7X

When it comes to compact weaponlights for concealed carry, two models are currently dominating the conversation: the new SureFire XC3 and the proven Streamlight TLR-7X. Both lights promise to deliver serious performance in a package small enough for everyday carry, but which one deserves a spot on your EDC pistol?

 

Surefire XC3 vs. Streamlight TLR-7X in a case.

 

Is SureFire XC3 The New Standard?

SureFire calls the XC3 "the new standard in duty-grade compact weaponlights," and the specs back up that confidence. 

With 550 lumens and an impressive 7,200 candela output, this light punches well above its weight class. The XC3 features a Hybrid beam pattern that delivers both a strong central hotspot and wide peripheral spill, making it effective for both target identification and situational awareness.

The light runs on a single CR123A battery loaded from the front, providing 1.75 hours of runtime. Its ambidextrous switches offer both momentary and constant-on activation with tactile feedback, and the bezel can be loosened to a lockout position to prevent accidental activation during transport.

 

The 4Bros sign.

 

Streamlight TLR-7X Is The Proven Performer

The TLR-7X has earned its reputation as a go-to compact light for concealed carry. Offering 500 lumens and 5,000 candela, it provides solid performance in a compact package. The dual-fuel capability sets it apart, accepting either a CR123A battery or a USB-C rechargeable SL-B9 battery, a feature the SureFire lacks.

With ambidextrous rear paddle switches and solid mounting, the TLR-7X emphasizes user-friendly operation. Its 1.5-hour runtime on CR123A matches closely with the XC3, while the rechargeable option provides added convenience for frequent training.

 

Both the Surefire XC3 vs. Streamlight TLR-7X.

 

Performance Comparison

The most significant difference between these lights lies in their beam characteristics. The SureFire XC3 offers slightly more lumens with substantially higher candela (44 percent more than the TLR-7's 5,000 rating). This translates to noticeably better performance at distance. The XC3's tighter hotspot and higher candela rating give it superior throw for identifying targets beyond typical defensive distances.

The Streamlight also produces cool white light, whereas the SureFire appeared noticeably warmer. The difference in color temperature is largely a matter of preference, though some shooters find warmer light better for contrast and target identification.

 

Size and Compatibility

Both lights are designed to fit the same holster ecosystem, with the XC3 uses a front-loaded CR123A battery and fits into a variety of existing holsters (the same ones designed for the aforementioned TLR-7). This is a smart move by SureFire, as it means upgrading from a TLR-7 series to an XC3 won't require new holsters.

The TLR-7X features a compact footprint optimized for use with many compact pistols, including the Glock 19, M&P Compact, and Springfield Echelon 4.0C. The XC3 targets the same platform compatibility, including the P365 XMACRO and FUSE series, Walther PDP, and Springfield Hellcat Pro.

 

Real-World Testing

At the SureFire Texas Showdown event, the XC3 was tested extensively on Staccato pistols equipped with red dots, and initial impressions were positive despite some pre-production hiccups with prototype switches that have since been resolved. The production version now features glass-filled polymer switches and backplate for enhanced durability.

The intense hotspot of the SureFire XC3 allows it to perform more like a full-size weaponlight without sacrificing its compact dimensions. During testing, the beam pattern is much more comparable to a full-size X300U than anticipated given the XC3's size.

 

4Bros Holster.

 

Price and Value

Here's where the comparison gets interesting. 

The TLR-7X typically retails for $130-$150, making it an accessible option for most concealed carriers. SureFire has a price of $299 on its website. That's about double Streamlight's price, a significant consideration for budget-conscious buyers.

 

Battery Options Are A Key Differentiator

The TLR-7X's dual-fuel capability is a standout feature. The newest version of the TLR-7X is multi-fuel, meaning the light can run on the ubiquitous CR123A or a USB-C rechargeable SL-B9 battery. This flexibility can save money on batteries during training while ensuring you always have power options available.

The XC3 sticks with the traditional CR123A-only approach, which some may prefer for its simplicity and the widespread availability of CR123A batteries.

 

Both weapons pointed away from the camera.

 

Our Verdict?

Both lights excel in their mission to provide serious illumination in a compact package suitable for concealed carry. The SureFire XC3 edges ahead in raw performance with its superior candela output and tighter beam pattern, making it the better choice for those who prioritize maximum capability and are willing to pay a premium.

The Streamlight TLR-7X remains an excellent value proposition, offering comparable performance at less than half the expected price of the XC3. Its dual-fuel capability and proven track record make it hard to beat for most concealed carriers.

For duty use or those who demand the absolute best performance regardless of cost, the XC3 represents the new benchmark in compact weapon lights. For everyone else, the TLR-7X continues to offer outstanding performance and features that make it one of the best compact lights money can buy.

Ultimately, you can't go wrong with either light. Your choice will likely come down to whether the XC3's performance advantages justify its premium price point for your specific needs and budget.

We've got you covered regardless of which light you choose. Our holsters are specifically designed to accommodate both the TLR-7 series or the XC3, ensuring perfect retention and a smooth draw every time.

Each holster is made to order in Logansport, Indiana, and ships within 24-48 hours.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.